AveronInstitute

Glossary · The journal

What Is a Pareto Chart? Definition and Uses

By the Averon Institute editorial team · September 6, 2025 · 2 min read

A Pareto chart is a bar chart with a ranking discipline built in. Categories of trouble — defect types, complaint reasons, error sources — appear as bars sorted from most frequent to least, with a cumulative percentage line running above them. Its purpose is to separate the vital few causes that generate most of the pain from the trivial many that generate the rest, so a team knows exactly where to aim first.

How it’s used

The chart borrows its name from Vilfredo Pareto, the Italian economist who observed in the late 1800s that a small fraction of the population held most of the wealth. Joseph Juran, one of the founders of modern quality management, noticed the same lopsidedness in defect data and turned it into a working principle: the vital few and the useful many. To build the chart, a team collects counts by category over a defined window, sorts the categories tallest first, and draws the cumulative line to show how much of the total the leading bars capture.

The famous 80/20 ratio — 80 percent of the trouble from 20 percent of the causes — is a tendency, not a law of nature. Some processes concentrate their problems more sharply, some less. The insight is the ranking itself, and the permission it grants to ignore the small bars for now.

A worked example: a month of returns

Picture an online retailer reviewing one month of product returns. The team sorts every return into six reasons: wrong size, damaged in transit, not as described, arrived late, changed mind, and other. Charted as a Pareto, wrong size and damaged in transit tower over the rest, together accounting for roughly three quarters of all returns. That single picture ends a standing argument about where to begin. Sizing guidance and packaging get the first two improvement projects; the four small bars wait their turn. Without the chart, the loudest anecdote in the room would have chosen the project instead.

  • Count what actually matters: a Pareto by frequency can rank causes differently than a Pareto by cost, so build both when categories differ in stakes.
  • Keep category definitions stable between periods so this month’s chart can be compared with last month’s.
  • If “other” grows into one of the tallest bars, fix the categories before fixing the process.
  • Redraw the chart after each improvement — the tallest bar rarely stays the tallest.
  • Never treat 80/20 as a guarantee; the ranking is the insight, not the ratio.

A Pareto chart is how a team stops arguing about everything and starts fixing the one thing that matters most.

The Pareto chart is one of the seven basic quality tools, which makes it early curriculum. Our free White Belt introduces it in about six hours of foundation training, and the Yellow Belt ($129, 14 hours) puts it to work in team problem solving. By Green Belt, building one is a reflex — nearly every Analyze phase opens with a Pareto of the defect data.

Put it into practice

Ready to make it official?

Our Six Sigma belt programs — White through Black — are self-paced, 100% online, and end in a proctored exam and a credential you can verify and share.